If you think you understand what was happening in southern Italy between the coming of the Angevin dynasty in 1200s
and its departure in the 1400s, then you really have not been paying attention. And even if you have, it really won’t
help much. It was a complicated time.
I am wondering about a book called
Queen of Night, by Alan Savage. I haven’t read the book, but I have read a
plot description which includes this passage:
"Queen Joanna I of Naples was the most beautiful and accomplished woman of her times. She is also remembered as a
cold-blooded murderess and woman of the most questionable morals.
Queen of Night is her story…[one of an]…astonishing
range of intrigue, romance, warfare, rape, betrayal and sheer adventure…Queen of Night is an enthralling account of a truly
remarkable woman…”
I am tempted to think that the author, like many—including Neapolitans—, has fused Joanna I and Joanna II into a single
woman—beautiful, accomplished, cold-blooded, and immoral— kind of like Gene Tierney in
Leave Her to Heaven, or, for the
younger generation, the queen beast in
Alien Resurrection.
To set the record straight (primarily to get poor Joanna I off the hook) here is the chronology of the Angevin dynasty in Naples:
Charles I 1266-1285
Charles II 1285-1309
Robert 1309-1343
Joanna I 1343-1382
Charles III of Durazzo 1382-1386
Ladislao 1386-1414
Joanna II 1414-1435
Rene 1435-1442
The nitty-gritty on the two Joans is
Joanna I 1343-1382
Joanna II 1414-1435
Joanna I became sovereign of Naples in succession to her grandfather King Robert in 1343. She has no record of immoral intrique.
(OK, some say she had a hand in the murder of her first husband, but it was the 14th century—that’s a parking ticket.) She was put
to death by Charles, duke of Durazzo, who regarded himself as the legitimate king of Naples. It is this woman who fits the description
of “accomplished,” at least intellectually. She kept the company of the poets and scholars of her time, including Petrarch and Boccaccio.
Joanna II, on the other tentacle,is the preying mantis man-eating queen that Neapolitans still speak of when they point out this or that
building and whisper, “That’s where Joanna murdered her men after making love to them.” These sites “include but are not restricted to”
(to hedge my bet with some legalese) the Villa Donn’Anna at the beginning of the Posillipo coast; the no-longer extant Villa of Poggioreale;
a ruined mystery villa on a chunk of rock at water’s edge in Sorrento; and the alligator-infested sub-dungeon of the Maschio Angioino
(the Angevin Fortress) at the main port of Naples. Such tales are usually replete with hidden torture chambers and may include 100% un-verifiable
episodes of sex with horses. This Joanna came to the throne at the age of 45 after a dissolute life. She brought with her a young lover and
went through a series of others in a period that is one of the most confusing in the confusing history of Naples. The traditional view is that
she was not a particularly astute woman, and that her reign was one long scandal, one which ran through even the reign of her immediate successor
and did not end until the entire Angevin dynasty was replaced by the Aragonese.
Recently historians have tended, however, to give Joanna II the benefit of the doubt. Anecdotal accounts of her personal vices are less
the focus of interest than is the fact the Naples in the 1300s and early 1400s was pretty much ungovernable, especially by a woman—any
woman;
"Femines non sunt ut homines viriles" (“Women are not as virile as men,” said the Florentine Doppo degli Spini when asked
about Giovanna, thus converting what is biologically delightful into would-be profundity about ability to govern.) She did surround herself
with a lot of men, but almost all them were potential power brokers. The Angevins had taken a risk in the mid-1200s by moving the capital
of the kingdom from Palermo to Naples. True, a capital in southern Italy—once removed from Sicily—was no longer as exposed to the potential
flanking pincer moves of Islam in Spain and in the Balkans; it was also closer to the dynastic homeland, France; but it was also closer to
the centers of northern European military and diplomatic intrigue. Giovanna may have been doing what she thought needed to be done to stabilize
her kingdom.
So, judge as you will, but at least keep them straight.
(Images: Joanna I, top; Joanna II, bottom. Image on initial page: the crest of the Angevin-Durazzo dynasty, of which Joanna II was the last monarch.)